Inherent Dangers
- Vincent "Jell-O" Aiello

- Aug 20, 2021
- 5 min read
Updated: Oct 17, 2023
Since launching the Fighter Pilot Podcast over three years ago I’ve been afforded many interesting opportunities: speaking at gatherings, moderating panels, commentating virtual BFM derbies, and being a guest on other podcasts, to name a few. But being asked to write on behalf of others is particularly venerating—in late 2019 I was honored to endorse FPP friend Kevin Miller’s historical fiction, The Silver Waterfall, and last year I was flattered to pen the forward for a book of ‘lessons learned’ flying stories.
Fletcher McKenzie of the New Zealand-based AVgas Group was compiling 1,000 such stories in several volumes, with one dedicated solely to Naval Aviation. The global pandemic delayed the project, but Fletcher hopes the book—featuring stories from A-4, F-14, and F/A-18 crews—will go to print later this year. The forward, repurposed here, was intended to make the case that naval aviation is a dangerous pursuit but that learning from others can lessen the risks.
Captain A. G. Lamplugh famously said, “aviation in itself is not inherently dangerous. But to an even greater degree than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of any carelessness, incapacity or neglect.”
The year was 1931. Captain Lamplugh was chief underwriter and principal surveyor of the British Aviation Insurance Company, and, in that context, his assertion made sense. After all, man had been plying the seas for centuries and the associated hazards were clearly understood. Powered flight, however, was still in its relative infancy. At the time it was generally accepted that aircraft, as a rule, took off from terra firma and later returned there as well. It is little wonder such returns would come to be known as a landings.
But 20 years earlier, audacious young pilots had already begun mingling the sea and air in ways Lamplugh must not have fully appreciated. Eugene Ely, the first American pilot to launch and recover his specially-modified aircraft aboard a converted warship, ushered in an era of aviation—naval aviation—that forever changed warfare. With this new era came the unique hazards associated with flight operations at sea.
With all due respect to the captain, make no mistake, naval aviation is inherently dangerous.
Human error, material failure, and environmental conditions are among the factors most attributable to aviation mishaps. At sea, these challenges are magnified: an airfield’s-worth of people scurry around a chaotic 4.5-acre flight deck; aircraft depend on complex mechanical contraptions to launch and recover; and in addition to the usual weather hazards to aviation (thunderstorms, icing, and fog to name a few), naval aviators also must contend with a moving runway, rolling and heaving at the whims of an angry sea.
Over the course of my career, I spent more than three years at sea during five aircraft carrier deployments and it was not until my fourth that we finally did not crash an airplane or kill somebody. On my first deployment two F/A-18 Hornets collided while joining on an aerial refueling tanker at night. A 16-year veteran pilot and father of two was killed.
On my second deployment an S-3 Viking crashed moments after leaving the catapult. I watched in shock as two friends perished.
On my third deployment an EA-6B Prowler caught fire shortly after launch. Mercifully the four occupants ejected safely and were promptly recovered.
Between deployments, my airwing and others suffered cold cats, parted wires, ramp strikes, OCF, CFITs, and a host of other mishaps so frequent that naval aviators have their own vernacular for them. The hazards are there every single day, and they are real.
Sure, abiding by established policies and procedures is a good start but it is the retelling of near misses, close calls, and other “sea stories” that equips junior pilots to handle the myriad risks. As a new pilot in my first squadron, I remember listening to stories from senior pilots in the ready room. Stories usually began with “there I was…” and went on to tell of some new way certain death and destruction was otherwise cheated.
One night on my first deployment I was watching the ship’s closed-circuit television—Danger TV, we called it when our squadron executive officer was next to land. His aircraft was “coupled up,” meaning the autopilot was flying as the Hornet followed a homing beacon from the ship for a theoretical perfect landing. I almost quit watching because coupled passes are typically not as exciting as those manually flown but as the XO’s aircraft approached the back of the ship, it pitched up slightly and then abruptly nosed over—a potentially catastrophic maneuver.
Also observing the landing, but from a different vantage near the back port side of the flight deck, was the team of landing signal officers—pilots whose collateral duties are to ensure the safe and expeditious recovery of aircraft. The controlling LSO did not miss a beat, quickly waving off the XO who overrode the autopilot to narrowly miss the back of the ship and sure disaster.
After safely recovering on the next pass, the XO, LSOs, and curious onlookers (like me) debriefed the incident extensively, watching and re-watching the Danger TV recording I had seen live. The XO explained what he experienced in the cockpit, the LSOs described what they observed from their vantage, and the concern was later voiced to higher headquarters back home. The ship was directed to perform no further coupled approaches until the carrier suitability team of test pilots could come out to investigate.
This experience, as well as the hours of sitting around sharing stories—first listening as a young pilot, later telling my own as a more seasoned aviator—was invaluable. In fact, this fleet-wide practice was formalized into a periodical known as Approach Magazine which, to this day, widely disseminates such lessons learned throughout the fleet for the benefit of all pilots. Fletcher has assembled a version of that here.
On the pages that follow are harrowing and, at times, unbelievable sea stories from the ranks of naval aviators with hundreds of years of cumulative experience. While you may never land a high-performance jet on an aircraft carrier (…then again, some of you might!), you can learn from others by internalizing the lessons shared on these pages.
Because in the end, both sides of the argument are correct: yes, aviation is terribly unforgiving of mistakes but, also, naval aviation is inherently dangerous. Let these stories offer you a glimpse into the naval aviator’s world and entertain and educate you to be a professional and safe pilot. You owe it to yourself and the generations that follow.
Vincent Aiello
Retired U.S. Navy Fighter Pilot
Vincent became enamored with military aviation while attending his first airshow at eight years old. He earned a commission into the U.S. Navy after participating in the Navy Reserve Officer Training Corps program at the University of California at Los Angeles, where he graduated with a degree in Applied Mathematics.
He spent the next 25 years flying all models of the F/A-18 Hornet and Super Hornet, the F-16A/B Fighting Falcon, the TA-4J Skyhawk, and other training aircraft. He was an instructor pilot at the Navy’s fabled Fighter Weapons School, better known as TOPGUN, and accrued 3,800 flight hours and 705 day and night carrier landings over the course of five aircraft carrier deployments, and one more on the ground in Afghanistan.
After retiring from active duty, Vincent went on to a career with a major U.S. airline and is the founder and host of the Fighter Pilot Podcast, the internet radio show that ‘explores the fascinating world of air combat: the aircraft, the weapons systems, and—most importantly—the people.’




Eric Ly - CEO Kubet 9x mình thấy mọi người nhắc hoài nên tiện tay vào xem thử giao diện ra sao. Mình không phải kiểu đọc hết từng dòng, chủ yếu lướt để xem họ trình bày câu chuyện thế nào thôi. Nội dung trên trang tập trung vào tiểu sử và hành trình làm công nghệ của Eric Ly, có nhắc chuyện từng học Stanford rồi làm ở vài công ty lớn, nên đọc qua cũng hiểu vì sao ông ấy chuyển sang điều hành nền tảng. Cảm giác trang viết theo kiểu kể chuyện từng chặng, không bị nhảy cóc nên dễ theo dõi. Mình thích nhất là cách họ chia các đoạn rõ ràng, tiêu đề…
kp88.guru mình lướt thấy bạn bè nhắc nên bấm vào coi thử cho biết, kiểu xem giao diện họ làm ra sao thôi. Vào trang cái là thấy tông màu sáng, nhìn khá dễ chịu, chữ to vừa phải nên đọc không bị mỏi mắt. Mình không ngồi đọc hết từng bài, chỉ liếc mấy đoạn giới thiệu là thấy họ nói nhiều về cổng game trực tuyến và có nhắc tới chuyện đang nổi ở Việt Nam gần đây. Cái mình thích là bố cục không rối: kéo xuống là các khối nội dung tách bạch, nên muốn xem phần nào thì nhìn phát nhận ra luôn. Menu để ngay trên đầu trang, bấm qua lại nhanh, không phải…
Trước khi thử bất kỳ nền tảng giải trí nào, mình thường xem qua các số liệu thống kê. Khi tìm hiểu về https://lx88bet.com/ mình thấy họ đề cập đến số lượng tài khoản hoạt động và kho trò chơi đa dạng. Giao diện được thiết kế gọn gàng, nội dung trình bày mạch lạc nên rất dễ theo dõi. Cá nhân mình đánh giá cách tổ chức thông tin khá rõ ràng và thân thiện với người dùng.
Mình thường đọc kỹ phần thống kê trước khi trải nghiệm một nền tảng giải trí trực tuyến. Khi xem qua các con số được công bố, mình thấy hệ thống đề cập đến lượng tài khoản hoạt động và số trò chơi phong phú. Trong quá trình tìm hiểu thêm về Open88 mình nhận thấy cấu trúc nội dung được xây dựng mạch lạc, giúp người dùng dễ theo dõi. Giao diện nhìn gọn gàng và thân thiện. Cá nhân mình cảm thấy cách trình bày khá rõ ràng.
Tối qua mình đọc các bình luận trao đổi trên một diễn đàn, mình bắt gặp KP88 được chèn vào giữa câu chuyện. Mình bấm thử xem cho biết, chủ yếu là để xem cách trình bày và cấu trúc nội dung. Lướt nhanh thì thấy tổng thể khá gọn gàng, tạo cảm giác đáng tin cậy. Xem xong mình quay lại đọc tiếp các bình luận khác, chứ cũng không đào sâu thêm